No man is an iland
...daily blog with email marketing advice, news and best practices
Feed | Latest posts | By Mark Brownlow
Brought to you by Campaigner Email Marketing
On the whole, things look reasonable, but that masks a few problems you need to know about.
In Q2 2006, 87% of sent mail got through to the recipient's inbox at US ISPs and email providers. Of course, a 13% failure rate is a lot of money left on the table, but not catastrophic. And delivery rates improved compared with the same period last year.
Delivery rates for Europe fell slightly compared to Q2 2005, but 91% still reached inboxes.
Those that don't reach inboxes either hit the junk folder or get filtered out as spam (false positives). On the whole, false positives aren't a huge problem. Lyris say 3.3% of the permission emails were filtered as spam in the US, just 0.075% in Europe.
But these relatively favorable figures mask big differences between ISPs.
If hotmail.com addresses dominate your email list, you may have a problem: the false positive rate is a mammoth 18.2% for that service.
All the more reason to track your delivery statistics by domain, rather than just looking at the overall figure.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
Displayed subject line lengths vary from 10 characters (new Blackberry) to 124 (Outlook bottom preview pane). You'll also find some recommendations on writing those all-important words.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
Stefan Pollard explains why text-only messages can make a contribution to your marketing endeavors. He has recommendations on how to layout and design text-only emails, and some thoughts on html-text hybrids.
More on formatting text-only emails.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
Like buying your product.
Copywriting is a huge topic, but one that deserves more attention among email marketers. After all, it's the words and images that make up the message that drive responses.
A long-held copywriting truism is a need to highlight benefits rather than features. In this post, Janine Popick explains this concept and throws out a few enlightening examples of emails that do this well. And emails that do it not-so-well (with her suggested improvements).
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
Despite the tone of the piece, Loren isn't against open rates as a metric per se. Instead, he's concerned that the way we typically look at campaign reports is too superficial. By focusing on a few traditional numbers, we miss the important stuff.
He outlines some examples of how we'd be better served by taking a closer look at those metrics we already use and introducing a few others we perhaps never thought about before.
Should make you rethink your approach to evaluating your email marketing results.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
Anti-spam laws in the UK
Anti-spam laws and the EU
The purpose of each page is to give you a quick overview of the current situation and point you at those websites where you can learn about the practical implications for your own email marketing to or in those countries.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
Although he whips out a slew of reasons why benchmarks are not useful as a comparison for your own statistics, he hints that they might have other uses in terms of monitoring trends and similar. More on metrics.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
You can get my views on their usefulness here.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
In this article, Spencer Kollas explains why you need to track deliverability on a recipient domain by recipient domain basis. As well as the theory, he has plenty of practical advice on where to focus your efforts.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
He has clear words on list rental and a few ideas on tactics you can use to boost your numbers.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
Now the newsletter is double opt-in so it's impossible for me to spam anyone. To get on the list you have to submit your email address and click on a confirmation link in a welcome message before you can ever get an email from me.
Not to mention the fact that the whole purpose of this website is to encourage email marketing best practices, one of which is "do not spam."
So presumably it was one of those "hit the spam button because I can't be bothered to unsubscribe" things.
But gosh it hurts whenever that happens. It's like when you first started school and spent hours on your handwriting homework, only to get the same grade as little Johnny (who finished his homework in two seconds and writes like a confused squirrel monkey).
But the lesson is, no matter how much you try, someone, somewhere still thinks you're spamming. There's no room for complacency in this game.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
Both pages include an overview of the current standpoint, with links to sources of detailed info. Canada is notable, of course, for not actually having any specific anti-spam laws.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
An excellent starting point for all things to do with unsolicited commercial email is the Spam Links anti-spam portal. There's a mountain of links there to numerous helpful sites covering such things as legislation, technological issues, blacklists, anti-spam resources and much (much) more.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
The AOL Postmaster was among the participants, along with a marketer, an analyst and two email marketing vendors.
A lot of topics get discussed, including various deliverability issues such as reputation and authentication.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
It looks at the content (and thoughts behind) an email newsletter for financial advisers. One that gets clicks and open rates most of us can only imagine when drunk.
Their approach is certainly one worth considering for your own efforts.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
Email marketing (done properly) brings both a performance ROI through direct response. And it also has benefits in terms of brand awareness and consumer behavior.
The implicit suggestion, then, is that email advocates need to be a little less circumspect about staking a claim for email in the marketing budget.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
As well as benchmark and planning figures, there's a heap of insight on what to test, how people read pages of search results, shopping behavior and other stuff you'll find in the sales blurb.
*the visitors you pull in from PPC search engine clicks should get a chance to opt-in to your emails, so you can remarket to them without paying Google or Yahoo another big wad of cash.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
I'll add a couple of more countries and regions next week.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
The gist of the message is that there is no universal right time. But they list various criteria worth considering when determining what should or might work for your list and audience.
Two more tips:
1. You can always test to discover the right time of day and week to send, just like you might test subject lines.
2. It's worth revisiting the topic every now and then if you think a shift in timing might improve things. Consider a change carefully, though, if you've conditioned people to expect your email at certain times and on certain days.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
Tanya Candia examines the role played by users and senders in determining that reputation, chats to a reputation services provider and reveals some email best practices (so you can keep your own reputation as pristine as possible in the online world.)
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
But there are some good vendor-authored email design guides out there. The latest is the EmailLabs "Complete Guide for Creating HTML Emails." It's a 17-page set of technical and design best practices you can access once you fill out the form here.
It covers various HTML coding and design issues, including designing for preview panes and disabled images. Although focused on HTML email, there's also some bits of advice on text-only messages, email preference centers, testing approaches and other related topics.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
Subscribers can login with their email address and, for example, see what emails they currently get from you (and change the selection), modify their preferred email format or change their email address.
They let you do a better job of communicating with your subscribers, such that the latter are more likely to stay subscribed, sign-up for new emails and submit and update information about themselves. All of which means more email marketing success.
So what are the fundamentals that need to go in such a center? Simms Jenkins has the answer.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
She explains why and how you should add an email opt-in to the landing pages you use as part of your PPC search marketing.
The logic is simple. You paid for them to visit once. Now make sure you get them to opt-in to your emails so you can target them again once that first visit is over.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
Since there's no details on the survey's methodology or sample size, I can't comment on the numbers, but the gist is clear...
A significant number of people getting your marketing emails will likely not see the images you put in them. Enough people so that you simply cannot afford to discount them from your thinking when it comes to designing those messages.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
In this piece, Stefan Pollard looks at some changes to Windows Live Mail, Yahoo Mail and Outlook, and suggests what you might do to ensure they don't turn your carefully crafted message into a pile of gibberish.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
There's a lot of talk about super new targeting techniques based on subscriber behavior. Here's an example: a customer places a product in his shopping cart but fails to complete the transaction. This triggers an email to him which offers 5% off that very product if he returns to complete the purchase.
In other words, sophisticated email marketing tools track behavior online and send out customized emails based on this behavior.
It's great stuff. The more targeted and relevant the email, the more likely you get a response. This kind of on-the-fly customized email program has a big future ahead of it.
But I never read much about the potential issues associated with such approaches. I write this as a recipient of triggered email, not as someone who has done this kind of email marketing (so feel free to jump in if you have and disagree.)
1. Technical complexity
It's very easy to describe the concept of behavior-driven emails, but nobody says much about implementing it. Your web analytics needs to talk with your email system. That sounds like some heavy-duty technology or upgrades. Or are there integrated off-the-shelf systems available that can automate all this for you?
2. Privacy and permission
People care about privacy and preserving their anonymity, as you can tell from the uproar that accompanies any public discussion of cookies, spyware and similar. Is there an issue here? Will some people object to their favorite shopping site so obviously tracking their activities? Or don't they care?
Plus: permission to send these kinds of emails needs to be built into your opt-in process.
3. Conditioning
We already know that discounting practices can condition customers to expect never to pay the full price. Does conditioning matter here? If abandoned shopping carts always lead to an email coupon, will we train shoppers simply to load up their shopping cart, leave the site and wait?
4. Rule-setting complexity
Then there's the time and effort required to set up all the rules that determine when and what emails are triggered. Some examples:
Timing: how long after the trigger behavior do you wait before sending the email? How long do you wait before you assume that shopping cart really is abandoned?
Frequency: how many times do you allow a trigger email to go out. If I browse, but don't buy, get an email, browse again, but still don't buy, what happens? Another email? How many times or for how long do I have to browse before it's worth intervening again?
Priorities: suppose I look at 25 different products, but don't buy. Which of those products gets the focus in the next email you send me?
False interpretations: since the whole process is automated, how many ifs and buts do you have to give the system? What degree of error can you accept in terms of the system interpreting behaviors poorly.
Here are two real-world examples from an online book retailer that likes to send me emails with recommendations based on previous purchases. (Which is great in theory.)
I once bought a book which helps your kid to learn the alphabet. Two years later they tell me since I bought a book about teaching your kids the alphabet, I might like to know there's a new book out on the same subject.
Whoops: are they suggesting my kid needs more than two years to learn the alphabet?
I once bought a book on Buddhism. Some people who bought books by that author apparently also bought books by another author. The recommendation for that second author? "An Introduction to the New Testament for Catholics."
Whoops: I'm not Catholic, not even close (hint: check the first book topic).
I use these examples simply to illustrate how automation can bring about errors. Of course the net effect of their strategy (mostly the system gets it right) is positive. But is there any way to avoid these errors?
I write this not to appear negative about the potential of triggered emails, but because I'm fascinated at how these issues are tackled by practitioners. If you have any opinions, let me know and I'll publish the polite ones.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
She begins with a summary of the fundamentals, and then presents a side-by-side comparison of B2B and B2C email marketing approaches as regards list selection, list building, content development, timing, response tracking and permission.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
Jeanne Jennings offers insight into how a car rental firm is using rental confirmations to drive sign-ups.
It's worth mentioning the high open and click-through rates these confirmations are getting. This reinforces the idea that it's exactly these "non-marketing" messages that offer the biggest opportunity to engage the attention of the recipient.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
It's part of my ongoing project to introduce people to key email marketing topics and show them how or where to get further information.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
But if you do want to save yourself time and money, you could just take two minutes to read this article by Michael Katz.
Written primarily for small service companies and consultancies, it tells you all you ever really need to know to be able to write a successful customer retention and acquisition newsletter.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
A few email blunders can wreck both.
Stefan Pollard outlines five areas you need to review to ensure they're not dragging your brand down (with your bottom line results following closely behind).
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
It seems a lot of people are in denial about this, though Sherpa do manage to get some suggestions from the field on how to deal with the issue.
One approach is to ask for ad placement up the top of the email, where it's more likely to be seen.
That's great if you're an advertiser. But as a publisher, I don't want that crucial top space "wasted" on an ad, which is unlikely to persuade people to dig deeper into the email.
So there's a balancing act which needs to be resolved there.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
Instead of offering people a bunch of different newsletters, you offer them one. Then let the reader choose which types of content should go in it.
Instead of 20 newsletters, each on one topic, you have 1 newsletter which can have up to 20 topics in it (depending how many the reader selects).
There are many benefits to this approach. For example, it makes life simpler for the subscriber and gives them more control. Too much email can sour a relationship pretty quickly, so you'll likely keep more subscribers happy for longer. Which is good, obviously.
So it's food for thought if your palette of newsletter choices is outgrowing your readers' willingness to get more email.
(As an aside, the Accenture representative suggests that "...if you only sign up for HR content and there's no HR content that month, you won't get anything from us...we're not marketing just to market."
Actually, you're not marketing at all. That would mean two months between newsletter issues. It's hard to have any influence or impact at that frequency. Relationships die if you send too much email, but they also die if you send too little.)
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
Written solely for those who have never encountered the word, offering a definition and an explanation of why they're important in online marketing.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
Her article has several tips on how to approach list building so that the people who do sign-up are likely to hang around longer and respond better to your messages.
Wendy has some interesting perspectives on such issues as sign-up incentives and the amount of information you require from prospective subscribers. A recommended read if you're looking for sustainable, long-term success.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
The question? "What is permission?"
The answer? Well, grasshopper, the path to enlightenment might begin with this new article from Simms Jenkins which takes a look at some email contact circumstances and advises the reader on the ins and outs of permission and associated anti-spam legislation.
Simms, like me, is not a friend of assumed permission.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
For example, he recently put together a 10-page report on sign-up practices which contain insights and tips for your own subscription methods.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
Rather than assuming you have funky database facilities or email preference centers, the article goes on to describe how you can define your groups simply by observing who clicks on what in previous email messages.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
Linda Schumacher tackles the problem head on with these eight tips on how to use your website to get more and better quality sign-ups to your list.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter

Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
The central point is that you can only go so far with bulk email, even when properly targeted. A promising alternative is to take those emails that folk already want to get (like order confirmations) and turn those into vehicles that add value for both the sender and recipient.
And the step beyond that is to set up messaging rules that send single or sequenced emails in direct response to actions or behaviors taken by the potential recipients.
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | as a biweekly newsletter
Twice a month, free, packed with email marketing advice and all the posts from this blog.

