Stagnating email marketing results: any explanation?
Latest posts | Feed | By Mark Brownlow on October 18, 2007
Not a facetious question this...We have a growing body of email marketing knowledge, experience and best practices, super new tools and technology, and stronger cooperation between ISPs and senders of email.
So you'd expect average email marketing results to improve over time, right?
But if you browse reports (like Sherpa's benchmark guide), you find that clickthrough rates (if we take that as an acceptable success measure) are not spiraling upwards.
Here's a quote from that report on CTRs for B2C emails sent to house lists:
So why the stagnation?
- Measurement issues and statistical anomalies?
- Influx of new marketers still learning the nuances of email marketing?
- General email fatigue?
- Overzealous list growth with folk sending too much email to too many recipients?
- Outlook 2007?
More statistics | Tags: email marketing, email marketing statistics, email marketing metrics, CTR, clickthrough rate
Permalink | Add to del.icio.us | 3 comment(s) - add yours!
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | biweekly email | via Twitter
Twice a month, free, packed with email marketing advice and all the posts from this blog.
3 Comments:
I don't have the answers, but I've often been wondering the same thing. I've added my two cents to MindComet's blog, emailmarketingvoodoo.com.
By MindComet, on
18 October, 2007
Thanks! Glad I'm not the only one wondering...
By Mark Brownlow - Email Marketing Reports, on
19 October, 2007
I just wonder how much of it can be easily explained by people reading the email but not clicking through. I receive emails from many places that I frequent both online and in person. With a few exceptions, I read almost every email...often from top to bottom. What I DON'T do is click very often. My personal click habits are very erratic...sometimes I click because I have more time that day, sometimes because I wanted to shop there anywhere, other than those reasons, I rarely click if the info I need is in the email.
I think that facet of the click rate makes it less than perfect.
By Jennifer, on
19 October, 2007


