The "mobile version" link in HTML emails. Hmmm.

Latest posts | Feed | By Mark Brownlow

blackberryAs use of mobile email spreads, we discover the need to link to a "mobile version" from our HTML email. It makes intuitive sense: the mobile design challenge solved in one swift link.

But do we give enough thought to its execution? Are we, in fact, making a complete pig's ear of it? In some cases, yes.

There are two distinct issues with mobile devices and how an email displays.

The first is that they have a much smaller screen than your PC or laptop. The second is that not all mobile devices can render HTML email appropriately.

As a result, we actually have three main mobile email scenarios:

1. Device handles HTML email fine

This user might value a link to a web version of that HTML email...a version optimized for a small screen.

2. Device displays the text version of the email only

This user might value links to mobile-friendly web versions of both the plain text and HTML email.

3. Device displays the original HTML source code or a simplified rendering of the HTML version

This user might value a clearly visible URL (the link typed out in full) to follow at the top of the HTML code, so they, too, can view a more appropriate version online with their mobile browser.

(For screenshots of all three kinds of email rendering, see Gregg Oldring's post.)

Given those scenarios, here some common mistakes I see:

No link in the plain text version


First, the link is only in the HTML part of the email: there is no mobile link in the plain text version (seen by devices in scenario 2). The assumption is that plain text is, well, plain text. Where's the problem for mobile users?

Plain text emails commonly have hard returns at the end of each line to ensure readability. Line lengths are typically set at 50-70 characters, depending on your taste.

On a mobile device, this text can end up looking like this:

Bad plain text formatting
(Screen capture from device using Windows Mobile 5)

Additionally, who says the recipient wants to see plain text email only? That display format is not usually a user choice, but is enforced by the mobile operating system.

Oversimplified "mobile versions"


Second, clicking on the "mobile version" link in the HTML email commonly takes you to a plain text version of the email confined within a narrow PDA/SmartPhone-friendly column. Which seems sensible.

But...those able to see that link easily (scenario 1) are, by definition, used to a fuller HTML experience. The link delivers an unnecessarily dumbed-down text version of the email.

(You could argue that bandwidth issues mean text-only versions are likely more acceptable to mobile device users.)

Buried links


Third, a "mobile version" link is buried several screens down when a simplified version or (particularly) the original HTML code is displayed (scenario 3). It never gets seen by the very people who most need the link.

Solutions


So, if you're going to have a "mobile version" link (another debate entirely), what should you do? Best practices are still to emerge, but consider these possibilities:

1. Add "mobile" URLs to your plain text version OR set the line length in this plain text version to a mobile-friendly number of characters (for scenario 2).

2. Offer a nice link to a "small screen" version in your HTML email (for scenario 1).

3. Make it easy for those with poor HTML email rendering (like Blackberry devices on older operating systems) to find and follow the "mobile version" URL (for scenario 3).

"Easy" how? Here I wonder if it's enough to top your HTML version with a typed link, similar to this MarketingProfs example. Anyone got some good ideas? Any of you clever code people have some elegant solutions for ensuring that link is easily seen and followed, even when the HTML displays messily?

If nothing else, some reflection on the "mobile challenge" reveals that simply suggesting "you add a link to a mobile version" isn't enough. (I've been as guilty as anyone in issuing that banal advice.)

The saving grace is that each passing day sees a greater and greater proportion of mobile devices fully capable of rendering HTML email. One day soon we'll laugh about some of these problems. Possibly.

More on mobile email to come in future posts. The more I learn, the more confusing it gets...

Tags: , ,

Permalink | January 20, 2009 | 8 comment(s)
Get posts like this: as an RSS feed | biweekly email | via Twitter

8 Comments:

"More on mobile email to come in future posts. The more I learn, the more confusing it gets..."

The confusion is the fun part, yes?

Regarding "View mobile version" links -- I love 'em.

I have a Palm Centro, and the included Blazer browser is pretty limited. Any and all mobile-optimized webpages are a boon to my mobile browsing.

In fact, when I see "View mobile version", I'm much more likely to click and view more of the content. I'm becoming self-selecting in what I click/don't click due to Blazer's limitations.

These "View mobile..." links help me jump that personal barrier. Nice post, great questions.
By Anonymous Tom Buchok, on 21 January, 2009  
 

The confusion is the fun part. Unfusing the confusion enough to write about it sensibly is the "not fun" part ;-)

On a serious note, I think there's a lot of unexplored territory here, so I hope a couple of posts will at least get a few people thinking harder about mobile email and the implications.
By Anonymous Mark Brownlow, on 21 January, 2009  
 

There is a blog post mobile rendering at http://www.contactology.com/blog/2008/10/03/what-does-an-email-look-like-on-a-blackberry/ that addresses this issue.
By Anonymous Steven, on 23 January, 2009  
 

Thanks Steven - great link which I'll feature in a follow-up
By Anonymous Mark Brownlow, on 26 January, 2009  
 

Hi Mark. I suggest to my clients that the mobile link in an email not point to an email at all but rather to a mobile-enhanced web page containing your email content. A mobile-enhanced web page looks good on computers and mobile browsers without the need for multiple versions. You can build a mobile-enhanced web page or a whole mobile-enhanced website at dollarmarketing.com or everywhereigo.com.
By Anonymous John Arnold, on 27 January, 2009  
 

Thanks John: a promising approach that covers more of your bases.
By Anonymous Mark Brownlow, on 27 January, 2009  
 

I haven't yet seen much discussion surrounding how to provide a mobile version when you're doing dynamic content. If I've got possibly dozens of combinations of content populating based on user attributes (personalization, which is held as a best practice) how can I build a mobile friendly version for each one?
By Anonymous Anonymous, on 29 April, 2009  
 

See my post in French ...
http://www.iphonekiller.fr/2009/06/email-mobile-creer-une-campagne-email-performante/
By Blogger JP, on 29 June, 2009  
 

Comments closed for this post