<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should your email template age with the relationship?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/iland/2010/02/should-your-email-template-age-with.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/iland/2010/02/should-your-email-template-age-with.html</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:53:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: blogjunkie</title>
		<link>http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/iland/2010/02/should-your-email-template-age-with.html#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>blogjunkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/iland/2010/02/should-your-email-template-age-with-the-relationship.html#comment-148</guid>
		<description>I get it, there are 2 versions of the email. The version the recipient gets depends on when they subscribed to the list. I&#039;m curious to try it out... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get it, there are 2 versions of the email. The version the recipient gets depends on when they subscribed to the list. I&#39;m curious to try it out&#8230; <img src='http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/iland/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Brownlow</title>
		<link>http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/iland/2010/02/should-your-email-template-age-with.html#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Brownlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/iland/2010/02/should-your-email-template-age-with-the-relationship.html#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Thanks Rene. Just ideas for now. I&#039;ve no evidence to suggest the concepts would (or would not) work. But I do wonder if we could be more flexible than we&#039;ve allowed ourselves to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rene. Just ideas for now. I&#39;ve no evidence to suggest the concepts would (or would not) work. But I do wonder if we could be more flexible than we&#39;ve allowed ourselves to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Brownlow</title>
		<link>http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/iland/2010/02/should-your-email-template-age-with.html#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Brownlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/iland/2010/02/should-your-email-template-age-with-the-relationship.html#comment-146</guid>
		<description>blogjunkie: the idea is that you could have two templates. One that overemphasizes recognition, which is what you start with and what people tend to think of as an email template.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then, if you agree with the hypothesis, once someone has interacted with your emails enough, they get the alternative template. This &quot;mature&quot; template might tone down some of the recognition elements and use the space saved for more useful things. This &quot;mature&quot; template would only go to those long-term subscribers. New subscribers and those who&#039;ve only been on the list a short while would still get the original template.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;m not saying it is or isn&#039;t a good thing, but raising the issue for consideration and possibly testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blogjunkie: the idea is that you could have two templates. One that overemphasizes recognition, which is what you start with and what people tend to think of as an email template.</p>
<p>Then, if you agree with the hypothesis, once someone has interacted with your emails enough, they get the alternative template. This &quot;mature&quot; template might tone down some of the recognition elements and use the space saved for more useful things. This &quot;mature&quot; template would only go to those long-term subscribers. New subscribers and those who&#39;ve only been on the list a short while would still get the original template.</p>
<p>I&#39;m not saying it is or isn&#39;t a good thing, but raising the issue for consideration and possibly testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene</title>
		<link>http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/iland/2010/02/should-your-email-template-age-with.html#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/iland/2010/02/should-your-email-template-age-with-the-relationship.html#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Interesting ideas, especially concerning subject line branding with/without branding. As always - thanks for sharing...! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting ideas, especially concerning subject line branding with/without branding. As always &#8211; thanks for sharing&#8230;! <img src='http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/iland/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blogjunkie</title>
		<link>http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/iland/2010/02/should-your-email-template-age-with.html#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>blogjunkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/iland/2010/02/should-your-email-template-age-with-the-relationship.html#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Mark, that&#039;s a very interesting idea. Thanks for sharing advanced list tricks with a newbie like me. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However I&#039;m curious about new subscribers signing up for your mature list. Won&#039;t the lack of branding &amp; pre-header text be counter-effective for them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, that&#39;s a very interesting idea. Thanks for sharing advanced list tricks with a newbie like me. </p>
<p>However I&#39;m curious about new subscribers signing up for your mature list. Won&#39;t the lack of branding &amp; pre-header text be counter-effective for them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Brownlow</title>
		<link>http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/iland/2010/02/should-your-email-template-age-with.html#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Brownlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/iland/2010/02/should-your-email-template-age-with-the-relationship.html#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Excellent point Justin that I hadn&#039;t thought about. Thanks for bringing it up. Reinforces the need to test before making a change like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point Justin that I hadn&#39;t thought about. Thanks for bringing it up. Reinforces the need to test before making a change like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Premick</title>
		<link>http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/iland/2010/02/should-your-email-template-age-with.html#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Premick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/iland/2010/02/should-your-email-template-age-with-the-relationship.html#comment-142</guid>
		<description>On removing branding from subject lines - don&#039;t forget that subscriber usage of filters in their email programs can come into play here.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If I have your newsletter set to go to a given folder upon reception, based on the subject line branding, and the next one doesn&#039;t because you removed the branding, what does that do to my experience?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the one hand, that message probably goes directly into my inbox (which, depending on the volume of email I receive, may or may not increase the likelihood of it getting attention). But will I be irritated at the change, because I now have to go and modify that filter? And if so, how much? I&#039;m not sure.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Maybe it&#039;s only a big deal if your subscribers are power users, but I seem to recall reading that a lot more people than one might assume use filters in their email programs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On removing branding from subject lines &#8211; don&#39;t forget that subscriber usage of filters in their email programs can come into play here.</p>
<p>If I have your newsletter set to go to a given folder upon reception, based on the subject line branding, and the next one doesn&#39;t because you removed the branding, what does that do to my experience?</p>
<p>On the one hand, that message probably goes directly into my inbox (which, depending on the volume of email I receive, may or may not increase the likelihood of it getting attention). But will I be irritated at the change, because I now have to go and modify that filter? And if so, how much? I&#39;m not sure.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#39;s only a big deal if your subscribers are power users, but I seem to recall reading that a lot more people than one might assume use filters in their email programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

