Once you’ve optimized your email, what else can you do?


Latest posts | By Mark Brownlow | 11 Comments | Licence this content

breaking throughIn the Brave New World of “best practices” email marketing, you eventually hit a wall.

Try as you might, you can’t lift responses much further with the tools and resources at your disposal.

You’re stuck.

And yet a sizeable majority of your subscribers still aren’t opening, clicking, reading, downloading, buying etc.

So what do you do?

One answer is to realize that what we understand by optimization…isn’t. Then you discover hidden facets to your emails that you can improve, together with your bottom line.

All very mysterious, so let’s explore…

Form and function, value and serendipity

Most topics in email marketing focus on what you might call the two pillars of functional optimization. (I love making words like that up).

The first pillar is building an email program that gives your messages the best chance of getting attention. That covers the technology, sign-up form optimization, welcome messages, preheaders, “share this” links, subject lines, design, etc.

The second pillar is delivering value. So when the message gets seen, it gets a response. That covers your offers and content, and includes all the things you do to improve the value you deliver: targeting, segmentation, trigger messages, etc.

Nothing wrong there. These are the right things to focus on.

The idea of delivering value is where we need to add new perspectives.

We know the typical subscriber has to decide whether giving an email some attention is worth his or her time. And the big factor in that decision is the likely value of that email.

So we try and deliver as much value as possible. But…we tend to see this value as purely functional:

  • What offer (item, price, discount, coupon) can we send that has the best chance of getting the subscriber to buy the relevant product or service?
  • What information (topic, length, perspective, level, etc.) can we send that has the best chance of getting the subscriber to actually read it?

Again, nothing wrong with that. It’s the foundation on which most successful email programs are built.

But success still relies on serendipity.

However targeted you manage to be, you’re still relying on catching the subscriber at the right time, in the right frame of mind, with the right current need. All of which are hard to plan for (especially the last two).

It doesn’t matter how optimized you are, you can’t please everyone every time with this kind of functional value. That’s the brick wall we all eventually face.

What about emotional value?

One solution is to recognize that value isn’t only created through a “functional transaction” (relevant offer or content).

We don’t read novels to do our jobs better. We don’t read emails from friends because they contain relevant offers. We don’t go to the cinema to get information. We don’t view paintings because of the value of the canvas and frame.

Value also comes from entertainment, inspiration, storytelling, humor, creativity, quirkiness, style, emotion, humanity…all things that rarely get considered in the function-dominated best practice literature.

And therein lies your chance.

Quality content, permission, creative design, value, relevancy, timing, personalization, customization etc. are important factors that take your email marketing amplifier all the way up to 10.

But these other, softer, difficult-to-measure elements may take it up to 11.

For example, I read every email that Michael Katz sends out. He has an informational newsletter about using email newsletters to market professional services.

I don’t learn too much from Michael.

Not because he hasn’t anything useful to say (he has), but because I’ve been studying the topic for over ten years and know my way around already.

So why bother to read every email?

Simple…every article is an entertaining read. He has style, humor and personality.

I have many calls for my attention, but I still find myself reading Michael’s articles, because he’s managed to establish a personal, emotional connection that overrides any content issues.

That’s the goal: an email optimized for functional value and performance, but which also has the emotional connection that keeps people engaged even when this functional value misses its mark (as is inevitable in any email program).

So how do you work on optimizing the non-functional aspects of your email’s value? Good question!

Part of the reason we focus on functional value is because it’s easier to measure, calculate and create.

It also fits with our technology-oriented view of the web. Most of the tools we use are there to help us optimize what we offer and what information we give out. They don’t help us decide how to present that offer or information.

Non-functional value is, therefore, harder to create, but here are some quick suggestions…

1: Turn data into people

peopleCreating more value for subscribers becomes easier when you start thinking of them as…subscribers. Not as numbers in a database or an email address.

As J-P De Clerck recently wrote:

“Whatever they are called: ultimately, they are just real people like you and me. 80% water, some flesh and bones, a brain and plenty of desires, issues, problems, challenges and dreams.”

Or as The Prisoner puts it:

“I am not a number, I am a person”

We are seduced by our wonderful campaign reports, spreadsheets, databases and other technologies into ignoring the human element in favor of numbers. Data is good. Data is important. But data is data and people are still people.

It’s hard to build an emotional connection with a number.

Once you keep the human aspect top of mind, you automatically start to plan, write, design and implement in a way that’s better suited to subscriber needs and emotions.

It can be helpful to remind ourselves of the real meaning of popular email marketing metrics. For example, “clicks” are not clicks, they’re people interested in buying/reading/learning more…

2: Add Personality

Suggesting you add personality to emails is a glib thing to say.

Those with a brand personality to project and protect have a head start (and a set of self-defined limits). But the rest of us are left wondering quite what a bit of personality is supposed to look like.

In essence, it’s anything that distinguishes the email from the mediocre. The mediocre is the bland sales or corporate style of writing and designing that everyone gravitates to because it’s safe, and because it’s easy to do by committee.

The lure of mediocrity is particularly strong in informational B2B newsletters: content-based vendor emails all tend to look and sound the same. And, yes, I’ve fallen into that trap, too.

All it takes to steer clear of mediocrity is more of a human voice. It doesn’t mean you have to be a writing master like Michael Katz. It just means recalling that the recipient reads the message as an individual, not as an “audience” or a group of spreadsheet cells.

For a longer discussion of personality in newsletters, there’s a whole book chapter on the topic available free online here.

3: Get creative and innovate

Emotional value is also helped by creativity and innovation. Two more recommendations that are so easy to say, less easy to do.

Again, the key step is recognizing and resisting the pull of mediocrity…developing a mindset or production environment that encourages you to develop unique, memorable, engaging campaigns, irrespective of the actual offers or content those campaigns might contain.

Off the top of my head:

Of course, all these ideas and concepts need testing and need to deliver, results wise. Personality doesn’t work if it’s the wrong personality for your audience.

So I’m curious. Do you agree? And what emails always grab your attention, even when the offer or content isn’t relevant right now?

Find related articles:

 
Permalink | September 22nd, 2010 | 11 Comments »
Get posts like this: RSS feed | via email | via Twitter | via G+

You can follow any comments on this blog post through the RSS 2.0 feed.

11 comments on “Once you’ve optimized your email, what else can you do?”

  1. Mark,

    Great post…I’m a huge fan of narrowing your focus and owning a position in the mind of the customer (subscriber). Delivering on that value proposition then allows you to expand, but most emails I receive still haven’t figured out who they want to be when they grow up.

    Personality is also key. It isn’t just about humor either, it is simply about having a point of view, being human and connecting with your subscribers in a way that they can relate.

    Lastly Mark, continuing our previous conversation, while I didn’t dream of becoming Angus Young, I did want to be a rock star. But more importantly, The Prisoner is my all-time favorite TV show, so maybe we are related?

    “Who is number 1?”

    “You are, number 6.”

  2. I actually find it difficult to articulate what I mean by personality, connections etc. As was famously once said, I know it when I see it.

    Which probably explains why we find it so difficult to implement, as opposed to finding the offer that gets the most conversions.

    Never too late to be a rock star, Loren. I made it as far as a terrible college band with my 3-chords-maximum lead guitar. We got paid NOT to play.

  3. Great points Mark, optimization isn’t only about the base product, but also about the extended product (everything that adds an emotional response).

    Thing is that your cheese is constantly moving. That is why brand change their proposition, pricing & products. Same applies to your communication and e-mailmarketing. So when you think you’ve finished optimizing, keep a keen eye out. Your readers might expect something different from your next publication.

    More on the moving of cheese:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Moved_My_Cheese%3F

  4. Mark Brownlow says:

    I agree Jordie: optimization is a never-ending process. Not least because your audience’s expectations and characteristics also change with time.

  5. Lily says:

    A very interesting post!
    The optisimation of the your email marketing campaign is very essential. I would also add that email marketing really enhances the open communication with your current and potential customers. By personalisation of the messages, participation is encouraged. Email marketing helps building strong awareness and generate customer database. It provides a more interactive communications process.

  6. Jenny Peters says:

    And this from the man whose newsletters I always eagerly open as soon as they arrive, and always recommend to colleagues for combined witticism & original take on things. You’re the writing evidence of the importance of personal style and emotional factors. (and I learn a lot from you too!)

    Recent evidence:
    - ‘you should marry me…now’
    - The wrong one will halve them. (Damn).
    - all of the famous inboxes
    - (I love making words like that up).

  7. Jenny, you make a man blush! Thanks for the kind comments.

    Big thanks actually – it’s often hard to know if a particular writing style/approach is appreciated, so this kind of feedback is very good to have. (Hoping you are representative and not an exception :-)

  8. Marston Gould says:

    Mark – I’d like to emphasize a twist on #1 from your post. The single most common mistake made by most email marketers, often because their ESPs are incapable of meeting this requirement, is to build email programs that are aware of the depth of engagement between the emailer and each individual on their list.

    Everyone recognizes how important welcome programs are, but isn’t it odd that as soon as these are over, we tend to lump everyone into a big list. Sure we segment them for all sorts of attributes, but we forget one of the most important ones – relationship length and intensity.

    Just like with real life, these important variables tend to wane over time. If you were to normalize every user in your database from time of subscription to current time on file and plot out their open, click through, visit, page view, and purchase rates you would likely see series of common decay rates. Sure there are a few outliers here and their, but the bulk of almost every list starts strong and then fades over time.

    Yet knowing this, do we continue to craft email programs for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 10th, 20th, 50th interaction? Do we segment people based on what level of engagement they had with our last email and then treat them differently? Do we run tests for highly engagement, somewhat engaged, and little engaged users at the ‘nth’ campaign and continue to optimize that, normalized to our entire database?
    I’ve seen very few mailers ever do this, and yet it can be one of the the most powerful ways to construct a life cycle email program.

    And each time a customer interacts with your email, the subsequent program needs to be aware of this. Everything from timing, message, form, and content can be altered based on the insights gained from this exercise.

    Essentially, this is nothing more than practicing a time-of-file based recency model. Difficult to execute yes. Time consuming to map out and delivery, true. But the value is enormous and one of the best ways to keep email programs from sinking into stale decay – simply because you can determine if new cohorts are behaving the same, better, or worse than prior cohorts, to what degree, and at what point in the life cycle. This creates enormous predictability with your list.

    It also allows for the creation of targeted efforts where the largest impacts can be created by understanding where the greatest fall off in your customers occurs within their life cycle.

    So you are correct – don’t treat subscribers like numbers – to the nth degree!

  9. Mark Brownlow says:

    Brilliant comment Marston. Thanks for contributing.

    What strikes me is that if a full model is too difficult, you can still pick out elements. It can be as little as knowing at what point most people start to lose interest and then setting up an automated trigger campaign that rekindles interest at just the right moment…

  10. Deb Angus says:

    Great conversation. I think it is important to also remember that these types of campaigns are critical to the branding experience. We want our customers to identify with the brand, and it is impossible to have someone really identify with courier 12 point type! You’re right — we have to capture our customers’ attention, and then we have to deliver value. I subscribe to capturing attention with great images and short headlines, and then after that, it is all about the value.

    Thanks for your thoughts and providing the chance to share.

    Deb Angus

  11. Mark Brownlow says:

    Deb – that sounds like a great approach.

Leave a comment